The following opinion column by Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry President and CEO Danny Seiden originally appeared in The Arizona Republic earlier today.

It’s hard to remember a time when our nation was as deeply divided as it is today.

Now more than ever, we need elected leaders who are willing to buck party politics and work toward finding common-ground, commonsense solutions to address our challenges, bridge our division and begin to move our country forward.

Unfortunately, examples of this kind of leadership are becoming fewer and farther between. Nowhere is that more apparent than in Washington, D.C., where political expediency and pandering to the party base increasingly take precedent over the pursuit of broadly supported bipartisan solutions.

Then there’s Sen. Kyrsten Sinema – a refreshing independent voice amid a chorus of deafening partisan rancor. Throughout her first term, Sen. Sinema has demonstrated the kind of bold and brave public service many people may have thought died with the late Sen. John McCain.

That maverick spirit has been on full display in recent days, as Sen. Sinema held her ground in supporting the long-standing Senate filibuster amid intense and incendiary political pressure from her own party.

The senator’s stance on this issue should have come as a surprise to no one. In a from last June, Sinema wrote: “If anyone expected me to reverse my position because my party now controls the Senate, they should know that my approach to legislating in Congress is the same whether in the minority or majority.”

She reiterated that position during a recent , reminding her colleagues that “we have but one democracy. We can only survive, we can only keep her, if we do so together.”

You would think that message of bipartisanship would be widely embraced, welcomed and celebrated in this time of severely fractured politics. After all, it’s exactly what politicians, pundits – and yes, opinion columnists who appear on these pages – have been preaching for years.

Not so. Rather than praising Sen. Sinema as a profile in courage, the same chattering class that has been crying for civility has laid bare its hypocrisy – spewing vile, threatening and dishonest attacks on the senator’s character and distorting her record.

Ironically, some people – all of whom know better – have resorted to the same overheated, hateful rhetoric that they’ve longed claimed has no place in the public square.

“Worse than the ‘Ku Klux Klanner’ of the 1960s.”

“Killing [Dr. Martin Luther] King’s legacy” and “turn[ing] America back to the Jim Crow era.”

These are dripping off the pages of Arizona’s newspaper of record.

Nationally, the backlash has been equally repugnant, with MSNBC talking heads calling Sen. Sinema – among other things – “” and her staff “.”

These accusations are not only ridiculous – not to mention flat-out false – but they are also corrosive. If anything is a threat to democratic discourse, it’s language like this.

This is about more than a single policy issue. We are at a place where working across the aisle to advance bipartisan solutions – the very thing the Senate was designed to do – is now met with vitriol, and decried as failure.

If we are truly going to heal our fractured country, we must first start by toning down the dangerous and divisive rhetoric. And we must realize that the consistent pursuit of bipartisan agreement is not a threat to democracy, but an asset.

We’re grateful to have that in Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema. We would hope our entire delegation – and all of our elected leaders – would follow her example.  

Danny Seiden is the president and CEO of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry. On Twitter: .

The post If we say we want bipartisanship, why are we skewering Sen. Kyrsten Sinema? appeared first on 91ֱ��.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry on Tuesday night convened a statewide tele-townhall about why the groups are urging Sen. Kyrsten Sinema , D-Ariz., to oppose the massive social spending bill known as Build Back Better.

Arizona Chamber President and CEO Danny Seiden and U.S. Chamber of Commerce Chief Policy Officer Neil Bradley discussed the bill’s negative effects on inflation, the tax environment and federal budget deficits. 

Seiden said Arizona’s economy was one of the fastest states in the country to recover the jobs it lost during the pandemic-induced downturn and he noted the consistent rate at which the state is attracting new jobs. 

The reconciliation bill, warned Seiden, could hurt the state’s positive growth trajectory, and his chamber is urging Sen. Sinema and her colleague Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., to reject the legislation. 

Seiden said the bill is too expensive and that it will make the “already Jimmy-Carter-level inflation rates even worse.” 

Bradley, a public policy veteran, said that the bill was one of the worst pieces of legislation he has seen in some 25 years of tracking Congress’ work. 

Bradley also noted that Arizona’s economic growth can be hindered by policy crafted in Washington, D.C.

“Arizona is what we want the nation’s economy to be: dynamic, vibrant, growing –  that’s the definition of what we want to emulate,” Bradley said. “The problem is that sometimes Washington can throw a wet blanket on all that growth and at the same time raise prices for everyday families and businesses.”

Bradley said that last weekend around 1,880 pages of the bill were received by lawmakers on Capitol Hill containing “taxes, new powers for the Internal Revenue Service, and [new] ways of regulating businesses.” 

Sixty-three percent of small businesses across the U.S. have had to raise their prices due to inflationary pressures, and Bradley said he’s certain that the bill will add to these pressures partly because of the amount of money that it requires, which will “have to be borrowed, in this case from mainly overseas creditors, and paid back by higher taxes later.”

Seiden said he’s concerned with the penalties that the bill would enforce on Arizona’s economy, pointing to a portion of the legislation that offers a more generous tax credit for electric vehicle purchases if the car was assembled in a unionized factory.

Seiden said the provision conflicts with , which enshrines the state’s “right to work” (RTW) status and makes labor union membership voluntary. He argued that Arizona’s growing electric vehicle manufacturing sector is thanks in part to Arizona’s status as an RTW state, which the bill would undermine.

“This provision would punish non-union companies to choose between operating at either a competitive disadvantage or protecting their employees,” Seiden said. 

Both Bradley and Seiden called for the bill to be scrapped and that Congress should start over. They both expressed appreciation for Sinema’s work to improve the bill, but that their chambers are urging her not to support it and instead back pro-economic-growth policies. 

“Arizona’s Chamber and the U.S. Chamber are working together on an advocacy campaign here in the state thanking Sen. Sinema for so far standing up to the big tax and spend agenda in Washington and urging her to not let up, to keep fighting back against policies that will drive up costs more than they already are,” Seiden said.

The post Arizona Chamber and U.S. Chamber convene tele-town hall on reconciliation bill, urge Sinema to oppose appeared first on 91ֱ��.

Legislation passed by the U.S. House of Representatives would overturn Arizona’s right-to-work law that has been in place for 75 years, stirring alarm among business groups here and in other states with similar laws.

Advocacy groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are calling on the Senate to reject the anti-jobs proposal, saying it would hurt employees, employers, independent contractors and freelancers.  

“The PRO Act would, for all practical purposes, eviscerate Arizona’s right-to-work law, which would mean that workers in the state who happen to be in a union work setting would have to pay dues or they would be at risk of losing their jobs, said Glenn Spencer, senior vice president of the Employment Policy Division at the in Washington, D.C., the world’s largest business federation representing the interests of more than 3 million businesses.

“Their employers may well be forced to terminate them if they don’t wish to pay dues in that setting,” said Spencer, who spoke with 91ֱ�� (CBN) about the implications of the proposed law.

Sweeping proposal would set dangerous precedent 

The PRO Act, which stands for , would enact dozens of sweeping changes to current labor law in favor of unionization. Labor unions like the AFL-CIO are backing the measure. President Joe Biden has promised to sign the bill if it gets to his desk. Meanwhile, Arizona’s two senators, Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly, are current holdouts preventing the bill from moving forward. But the pressure is on. 

Of concern to businesses are a long list of new provisions, from requirements limiting freelancers’ ability to have flexibility over their own hours to allowing union organizers to engage in coercive tactics long held to be illegal.

Simply put, the proposed law would strip employees’ right to decide if they want to be in a union, disrupt the thriving gig economy, and hurt employers’ bottom line, Spencer said. 

Protect or harm workers’ rights?

The U.S. Chamber and hundreds of business advocacy groups are calling on senators to say “no” to the proposal. In Arizona, , including the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry, are joining the U.S. Chamber in opposition. 

Proponents of the PRO Act contend the measure would restore fairness to the economy by strengthening the federal laws that protect workers’ right to join a union. But what they fail to mention is the number of measures that could have damaging consequences for employees and job creators, Spencer said. 

Here are some of the key reasons business groups oppose the measure: 

Elimination of right-to-work laws

Currently, Arizona and 26 other states have right-to-work laws, which give workers the choice of whether to join a union. States without right-to-work laws require employees to pay union dues and fees as a requirement for employment. 

“The bill represents a pretty dramatic intrusion into state laws,” Spencer said. “States since 1947 have been authorized to pass right-to-work statutes. Courts have ruled on those statutes, and this bill would essentially wipe all that out without any action by the state legislature.” 

The Act would allow coercive tactics long held to be unlawful 

Another concerning provision in the PRO Act would be the ability for workers of a company to picket companies that their employer conducts business with, called “secondary boycotts,” Spencer said.

“Most people aren’t aware of that concept and that’s for a very good reason because secondary boycotts and pickets have been illegal since 1947. For more than 70 years it’s been against the law to engage in that kind of activity,” he said. “Congress outlawed it specifically because it was so disruptive to the free flow of commerce.”

Under current law, union organizers can talk to an employer and employees where they are trying to unionize. If secondary boycotts are allowed under the PRO Act, union organizers could target any businesses the company does business with, occupying their parking lots and disturbing their customers.

“So you can see how widely disruptive a labor dispute at a single company could become. A whole range of neutral third parties that have nothing to do with a labor dispute suddenly get drawn into it,” Spencer said. “Just because you’re providing services as a third party, suddenly that could make you the subject of labor protests and pickets around something you really have no part of.” 

Strips independent contractors of their classification 

Another concerning aspect of the PRO Act is the redefining of independent contractors and freelancers similar to the controversial that was passed in California in 2019. 

Under AB 5, when a hiring entity claims that the person it hired is an independent contractor, the law requires the application of the “ABC test” to determine if workers are employees or independent contractors. For many independent contractors, the PRO Act would mean they would be considered employees for purposes of federal labor law, giving them the right to unionize. 

In California, the penalties for businesses that “wrongly classify an employee as an independent contractor” are civil penalties of $10,000 for a first violation, $30,000 for “repeat or willful” violations, and 1 percent of net profits if “widespread.”

Given the penalties, it could severely limit ’ ability to get hired, forcing them out of business.

Independent contractors could end up in union without knowing it 

Independent contractors tend to be dispersed, so if a union patches together a bargaining unit of independent contractors, it typically has to occur by mail, Spencer said. 

“What we’ve seen in other contexts like this is that a lot of these workers don’t even realize there’s any kind of union campaign going on and these campaigns are won by a majority of those who actually vote,” he said. “So if you have a hundred independent contract workers, if only 10 voted, six of them would constitute a majority of voters and that would be enough to impose a union on all 100.

“So you’d wake up one morning and suddenly discover you’re a member of a union and you have to pay union dues because right to work is gone.” he said. 

Economic growth would likely be hampered 

Research by the U.S. Chamber shows that right-to-work states tend to have higher rates of economic growth, higher rates of job creation and lower rates of unemployment, Spencer said. 

“So there’s certainly a personal cost to workers, but there’s a larger economic cost to the states as well,” he said.  

Sinema and Kelly key players in the debate 

For the most part, Democrats are leading the charge on the PRO Act. There are currently 47 Democrats co-sponsoring the bill in the Senate. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) said he will bring the bill to the floor if he can get 50 co-sponsors.

So far, Arizona’s two Democrat senators, Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly have not co-sponsored the bill. One reason given for their reluctance is the lack of bipartisan support for the bill. They also have a large cadre of constituents who support the state’s right-to-work status.

“Senators Sinema and Kelly have not co-sponsored this bill. That’s a good thing. People in Arizona should thank them for standing up for workers and right-to-work and employers,” Spencer said. 

Large opposition from business community 

Business leaders and advocacy organizations across the U.S. are sending letters to Congress, calling for an end to the PRO Act, including the , composed of hundreds of organizations representing millions of businesses that employ tens of millions of workers nationwide in nearly every industry.

Arizona chambers calling on Congress to vote “no” 

In Arizona, at least 20 chambers of commerce oppose the measure:

• Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry 
• Buckeye Valley Chamber of Commerce
• Chandler Chamber of Commerce
• Carefree Cave Creek Chamber of Commerce
• Coolidge Chamber of Commerce
• Glendale Chamber of Commerce
• Greater Phoenix Chamber
• Greater Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce
• Green Valley Sahuarita Chamber of Commerce
• Lake Havasu Area Chamber of Commerce
• Marana Chamber of Commerce
• Nogales-Santa Cruz County Chamber of Commerce
• Peoria Chamber of Commerce
• Prescott Chamber of Commerce
• Prescott Valley Chamber of Commerce
• Queen Creek Chamber of Commerce
• Southwest Valley Chamber of Commerce
• Surprise Regional Chamber of Commerce
• West Valley Chamber of Commerce Alliance 
• Wickenburg Chamber of Commerce

To read more about why business and industry oppose the bill, visit:.

The post Arizona’s historic right-to-work law threatened by federal PRO Act appeared first on 91ֱ��.

Arizona U.S. Senators Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly updated the business community on legislation important to industry and commerce Wednesday during the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry’s annual 2021 Update from Capitol Hill.

The two senators detailed measures in the recent federal relief package that will benefit businesses in Arizona and priorities for the rest of 2021. They also fielded questions about top business concerns including corporate tax rates, preservation of the filibuster, and the feared Pro Act, which has been labeled “the worst bill in Congress” by many in the business community.  

Neil Bradley, executive vice president and chief policy officer of the U.S. Chamber in Washington, D.C., also offered an insider view into the goings on in the nation’s capital as far as business is concerned. More than 500 attended the virtual event, which was sponsored by Salt River Project and the Arizona Indian Gaming Association. 

How businesses are benefiting from recent federal relief bill 

Senator Sinema (D) talked about measures she has successfully supported and lobbied for in the federal relief packages including the most recent $1.9 trillion .

Sinema emphasized her record of working across the aisle despite criticism from party loyalists at times. For her, ensuring that Arizona employers and employees weather the pandemic is her first priority, not party politics, she said.

“Over the past year, employers have had to make tough choices, adapt, and contend with bureaucratic obstacles that delayed relief,” Sinema said. “That’s why as a member of the Senate bipartisan group on Covid relief, I listened closely to Arizona leaders and worked to ensure that the new relief law addresses Arizona’s urgent needs.” 

Among the measures Sinema helped to pass are:

Restaurant relief fund: Sinema and Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., introduced and helped pass a restaurant relief fund of $28.6 billion to help small and mid-sized restaurants, bars, caterers, food trucks, breweries and other food service providers in need of assistance with rent and operational expenses. It provides grants of up to $10 million per entity with a maximum of $5 million per location based on the difference between 2020 and 2019 revenue. 

Save our Stages Act This legislation created a $15 million fund to provide relief to the entertainment industry like nightclubs, theaters and concert halls. 

Employee Retention Tax Credit This is a refundable against certain employment taxes equal to 50 percent of the qualified wages an eligible employer paid to employees after March 12, 2020, and before January 1, 2021. Eligible employers can get immediate access to the credit by reducing employment tax deposits they are otherwise required to make. Also, if the employer’s employment tax deposits are not sufficient to cover the credit, the employer may get an advance payment from the IRS.

CHIPS for America Act Another bipartisan effort led by Sinema resulted in the CHIPS Act being adopted in December. The CHIPS Act — Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors — established federal grants to enable advanced research and development, secure the supply chain and ensure long-term national security and economic competitiveness. 

Soon after Congress passed the act, announced a $20 billion expansion of its manufacturing operation with two new factories in Arizona, Sinema said. The project is expected to create more than 3,000 permanent, high-wage jobs and more than 3,000 construction jobs, beginning this year. 

Relief for border communities The measure provides $110 million to help border cities and towns overwhelmed trying to provide humanitarian aid to asylum seekers flooding across the border. 

Looking ahead: immigration, infrastructure, broadband

Sen. Kelly, who stepped into public office in December, said he spent his first five months doing a “lot of listening” to ascertain what is the most effective use of federal dollars in Arizona. Protecting public health while encouraging economic development are top priorities. 

“There’s a lot of work ahead to beat this virus and rebuild our economy. That’s been my focus,” said Kelly, who also spoke about his commitment to working in a bipartisan manner. 

In the coming months, Kelly said he is focused on a number of packages with business in mind including:

Infrastructure Congress has failed to pass a major infrastructure bill in the past but there could be enough momentum to get it done this year. The bill would include funding for not only roads and bridges but water and wastewater facilities and the expansion of broadband to shrink the digital divide between the haves and the have nots.

Immigration reform Another top priority is to finally pass immigration reform to secure a future workforce for the state and provide a pathway to citizenship for longtime immigrant employees as well as Dreamers, young adults who were brought here as children by their undcoumented relatives.

Upgrades to ports of entry Keeping the border secure and expanding trade in Arizona will require investing in new technology and infrastructure at ports of entry, another key goal, Kelly said.

“The federal government is failing our state when it comes to border security,” Kelly said. “We need a secure, orderly and safe process at the border.”

Business worries: corporate taxes, filibuster, the PRO Act 

U.S. Chamber executive Bradley rounded out the event by touching on a number of concerns to businesses. 

One is the growing national debt from three massive Covid relief packages, topping $5 trillion. In order to accomplish an infrastructure package and other important projects, federal relief in the last round should have been more focused and targeted to real need, he said.

“When you think of last spring, we knew Congress had to provide broad based support. But what we’ve seen is not every family, every industry and every state needs relief,” Bradley said. 

Bradley also talked about President Biden’s proposal to raise the corporate tax rate from 21 to 28 percent. He does not believe the measure has enough support to succeed, but if it does, it will risk the progress Arizona and the nation have made in becoming more globally competitive, he said. 

Changing the corporate tax rate would likely reverse the successes that followed passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, he said. Prior to the Act, the nation had one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. American companies were looking abroad for growth and new investment. 

“Tax changes would give a leg up for competitors abroad. Why would we want to do that?” he said.

When asked about efforts by many Democrats in Congress to remove the filibuster, Bradley said that would likely hurt the nation, too. With strong division between the right and the left, the filibuster ensures that that congressional members have to work to find common ground, he said.

Another concern is the proposed PRO Act of 2021, which also does not appear to have strong support in Congress, Bradley said. The Act would force employees to pay union dues regardless of whether they support a union, threaten private ballots in union elections, and strip workers of their independent contractor classification.

It’s an issue that is extremely worrisome to Arizona businesses, said Garrick Taylor, interim president and CEO of the Arizona Chamber. 

“This proposal is a litany of almost every failed idea from the past three decades of labor policy,” Taylor said. “It would undermine workers rights, most likely trap employers in a maze of labor disputes and force individuals to pay union dues regardless of their wishes.”

The post Business community gets update from Arizona’s U.S. senators appeared first on 91ֱ��.

Members of Arizona’s congressional delegation updated the business community on legislation important to industry and commerce last week at the annual Update from Capitol Hill presented by the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Salt River Project. 

The most discussed topic was the proposed fourth round of federal COVID-19 relief funding that has stalled in Congress.

Senators Kyrsten Sinema (D) and Martha McSally (R) both expressed their frustration with the process and vowed to continue to fight to break the deadlock. 

But it may not happen before the election, leaving those most in need behind. 

“This isn’t a game to me, because all across our state and across my neighborhood, people are struggling and still need relief,” McSally said. 

Sinema said she was disappointed that the White House and Congress are unable to compromise “when so many Arizonans are in need.”

“Partisan bills that won’t pass won’t move us any closer,” Sinema said. 

COVID-19, tourism, immigration, climate change among top concerns 

The two senators and seven of the state’s nine representatives “zoomed” in to give updates and answer questions virtually at the event. 

About 450 participants tuned in to hear what Arizona’s federal lawmakers are championing in Congress.

Representatives who also spoke at the event were Raúl Grijalva (D), David Schweikert (R), Paul Gosar (R), Tom O’Halleran (D), Andy Biggs (R), Debbie Lesko (R), and Greg Stanton (D). 

They detailed current and upcoming legislation and proposals for issues important to Arizona: immigration and trade, military and veterans, forest health and climate change, new interstate highways, modernization of ports of entry, broader access for Mexican tourists to visit Arizona, and the national deficit.

They also discussed the status of the CARES Act and a new round of funding for those who are still struggling from COVID-19 shutdowns. 

Standoff over another round of relief 

As intended, the CARES Act that was passed in March, has helped citizens, businesses, schools and governments in Arizona survive the financial shutdowns.  

The Act has saved over 85,000 businesses and over 1 million jobs here, McSally said. 

Now, another, more targeted round is needed to help those who are starting to be left behind, she said.  

But unlike the first three rounds of relief funding, the divide between the two houses is stalling progress.

Wide divide between “skinny” and “fat” pandemic relief bills

Currently, there’s a huge gap when it comes to funding a package.  

Two weeks ago, Democrats blocked a Republican-backed “skinny” $300-billion package that targets those most in need while taking into account the nation’s soaring debt, now over $27 trillion. 

Democrats are expected to present a $2.2 trillion package to the White House this week. 

President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has indicated he would be comfortable with a $1.3 trillion package, according to by Reuters on Friday. 

If a compromise can be reached, a new CAREs package most likely would include:

• Renewed Paycheck Protection Program funding for industries hardest hit by COVID-19 including restaurants, tourism and travel. 
• Expanded unemployment benefits. 
• A new round of direct checks to Americans. 
• Personal Protective Equipment for schools, nonprofits, healthcare providers and others.
• COVID-19 testing and research.
• Funding for education, low-income students and rural broadband access. 
• Liability protection from frivolous COVID-19 lawsuits against businesses.
• Rent, mortgage and utility relief.

Arizona’s delegation champions for residents and businesses 

In closing, Chamber President and CEO Glenn Hamer thanked Arizona’s entire delegation for working across the aisle in the best interests of the state. 

While their political differences can be stark, he said, they have come together repeatedly to pass historic legislation like the Colorado River Basin Drought Contingency Plan to protect Arizona water supplies and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that allows a border state like Arizona to tap into the largest free trade bloc in the world.

“We really appreciate how our very diverse political delegation works well together. I think it gives great hope to not only the state but the country,” he said. 

The post Arizona’s business community gets update from Capitol Hill appeared first on 91ֱ��.